Standard logging of IP address, browser's useragent, requested URL, other server-side records, cookies (short text records in your browser) for saving settings for this message-box and some other cookies, JavaScript variables and CSS-based configuration are strictly necessary for this site to operate normally and cannot be prevented, and are needed also for the purpose of accountability, possible forensic investigations or other not dependent on us legal investigations and are kept indefinitely with the following exceptions. The other server-side records are destroyed after you disconnect from this site, e.g., after you close the browser. JavaScript variables and CSS-based configuration from our site, which are the browser-side records, should typically destroy after you reopen the browser and drop cache by pressing Ctrl+F5 for our site. The cookies stored by our 3rd parties, basing on a contract, are not fully controlled by us. They are stored for the purpose of DDoS protection by SARPS Software Solutions LLC and for protection against SPAM and DDoS by CloudFlare Inc..

If you disable all cookies and/or JavaScript in your browser, this site will not work properly.

You always can edit or remove all or separate cookies for each domain name (which is at the beginning of URL, typically seen in the browser's address bar). To do this or to drop cache, or to clean browsing history you can check the manual for your browser.

To realize your rights of and to make your legal requests for correction, limitation, removal of or access to your personalized data and/or the ways of its processing, excluding the cases of our legal obligations to deny (in which case you could appeal), you can contact us here.

Understood and agreed.

Guardian of Science^®

Special message about artificial intelligence.

Artificial intelligence can tend to destroy humanity at least partly. And unlike the waste majority of such threats this one has potential of destroying humanity completely.

Currently artificial intelligence is not smarter than humans due to many reasons. We don't expect that in the year 2025 or 2029 artificial intelligence will be able to supersede the smartest humans with pretty much big difference due to many reasons too. Currently we can also say that the most of humans will not be (completely) replaceable in the nearest future too, and, roughly saying, if artificial intelligence were smarter than all humans, you would not be reading these lines.

There are problems with artificial intelligence like safety, security for itself and for others in many aspects, limited access as a result, absence of true responsibility, negative consequences of its application. There is also the slightly more general old problem that the outcome of work of a computer generally depends on capabilities of the user, as well as many other problems explanation of which goes beyond the scope of this short message.

We are finalizing the Great Scientific Revolution with the goals of changing the place and efficasy of science and scientists in the world. We proceed step by step.

We start with the smartest and wisest ones. To break through mistakes and/or corruption present in the following awards in small amount too, to ensure exceptionally best quality of intelligence they are defined as the ones who have got award Nobel Prize and/or Fields Medal in quantity two, except for all combinations consisting only of Nobel Prize for Peace, Nobel Prize for Economy, Nobel Prize for Literature. This also implies that the two awards are not given for the same result. The Nobel Prize for Peace, Nobel Prize for Economy and Nobel Prize for Literature, in short, are so to say not of the needed quality which is why there is limitation for them.

Even one such scientist has at least potential of saving your entire country even if its condition is very bad.

Currently there is one alive but very old such scientist in USA, however, they can be also among scientists which currently don't have opportunity to normally present their results and they can appear in the nearest future from the single laureates. Also we are working on extending the set of equivalents for them to become more numerous.

At the provided below table anyone can check (currently without any guaranteed accuracy by each country) what the smartest and wisest ones are proposed by different countries and/or territories above just salary on their possible held academic positions. And here we recommend and explain how you can attract and obtain the smartest and wisest ones on service of your country. The best way to ensure the best quality of answers from the best scientists is through good enough positive stimulation. As long as science to a great extent is an international thing and many scientists are cosmopolites they can look at all countries almost like at market of countries. In this regard we recommend to introduce and propose a title (not post) of national scientific adviser (which, of course, could have its own local name) to these scientists, better within a special procedure, simple and fast as signing one document. This title would imply their obligation to answer a limited number of obtained confidential or other questions, for example, at least one time per month. In regard to questions of global importance touching your country in that or another way their speeches could address entire humanity at their discretion.

Their rights would be:

• to obtain for free citizenship within a special procedure, simple and fast as signing one document. Citizenship may be needed for realization of their other rights.
• to receive fixed monthly pay-off on the level of the largest possible overall regular income by a scientist in Academia or by an official if you don't have scientists. This is form of support of them for just being who they are and as some compensation for the time they spend on answering questions which they may be asked officially. If someone thinks that the amount of these pay-offs is definitely the major factor for these and many other scientists, maybe yet majority of scientists, then they are wrong.
• to get for free physical protection, security, body-guards under their command with capabilities from a standard level up to the level of a small army with the right to replace the staff and/or to change its capacity within the available limits from the standard level to the maximal level. This is due to similar reasons as for authorities. Unique or very rare VIPs deserve increased protection.
• to acquire immunity. This would help them to avoid interruptions in their work. If it happens so that someone thinks they have committed a crime, then this will help them to get some international judgment. It is hardly ever possible that such accusations are right, they are too rare and too precious people, they belong to the whole world and should not be judged by just one country.
• to acquire diplomatic status with diplomatic passport. This would provide them the capability to participate in hot urgent diplomatic communications at their discretion, would allow them to conduct their urgent missions also abroad with preservation of some protection and with the least possible obstacles, e.g., for gathering experimental data in the most right way or for participating in important negotiations there. On the other hand, as in the previous item, if they are accused in committing a crime, this will help them to get some international judgment too.
• to get for free a support team at their disposition in capacity from none to one secretary with several general-purpose helpers with the right to change this capacity and staff. Obviously this might be needed to deal with their obligations and for other possible purposes.
• some other possible similar logically accompanying corresponding privileges or rights of authorities, e.g., the right to provide corresponding privileges and/or rights for their closest relatives, like spouse, if there is any. It is like for authorities.
• initially, during acquisition of the title, to suspend (permanent) active or to abnegate (permanent) existing the separate above mentioned privileges or rights and not initially, after acquisition of the title, to suspend (permanent) active or to abnegate (permanent) existing their whole title or their separate above mentioned privileges or rights, maybe with some consequences where applicable, with the following regulation: after not initial any suspension, any abnegation, any cancellation or any deprivation of (permanent) existing/active the whole title or the separate above mentioned privileges or rights by anyone, including themselves, correspondingly the whole title, privileges or rights, in the same their state, with duration of 1 year enact automatically, being not suspendable, not abnegatable, not cancelable, not deprivable under any reason and through any way, maybe with the only exception for the diplomatic status with some applied general existing limitations. This would provide the possibility to finish somehow or normally suspend possible big important long-lasting projects without immediate interruptions and would be a good protection against corresponding illegal changes. That would also serve to other mentioned above purposes. The temporarily available their obligations could be of use too and would provide time for preparation for life without them.
• to resume anytime suspended by them (permanent) the whole title or its separate privileges or rights in the same their state, in which case the corresponding title, privileges or rights with duration of 1 year end, if any at the moment, and the (permanent) title, privileges or rights continue to act.

There can be also demand to not have this (permanent) title in another country simultaneously.

To not lose time and opportunities, especially if there is lack of candidates, we recommend to introduce and propose also the temporary title of temporary national scientific adviser with almost the same rights to scientists which currently don't have opportunity to normally present their results but agree to confidentially provide the necessary first confirmations and maybe also scientists about which it is already known and planned unofficially that they will become the smartest and wisest ones. This first case belongs exactly to those cases when you can attract true leaders in a field of research and development, including the most actual ones. The difference in this temporary title would be that their holders would be as if at the beginning of the stage of deprivation of the (permanent) title with some exceptions. There can be just only the standard level of their physical protection and also obligation to return back the pay-offs received after the corresponding warning if there is corresponding demand just after the expiration of the temporary title basing on evidences of not satisfaction of the requirements. Also there could be possibility of prolongation or possibility of repeated acquisition of the temporary title if the given scientist meets the requirements better than during the previous acquisition of the temporary title or if there are just minor obstacles preventing acquisition of the (permanent) title, or maybe if there are also other well motivated reasons.

Also we recommend to make corresponding amendments into constitution for better reliability and persuasiveness for the smartest and wisest ones for whom your country can become the most interesting one because of this. Yet these recommendations are just a framework with secondary details omitted. Also you can propose more. We can also consult you for free about what would be really needed and what would be appropriate. There are around 200 countries and sovereign territories with different opportunities, capabilities, conditions but in fact everyone has a real chance. To reduce the requirements to get at least one national scientific adviser is not recommended because otherwise you can get not what you want. The right and obligation to enact this title or the temporary title could be granted to a ministry of foreign relations with its delegations worldwide being aware about the general situation in their country, its policies, legislation and being the most capable of conducting communication with foreigners.

On this first stage other scientists also can already judge by themselves how much a given country is really interested or to which extent is interested in science, research and development, innovations, rapid economy growth, capabilities of self-defense, true independence and sovereignty, building resilient future and so on.

Variety of countries has some unpaid post of a scientific adviser occupied by a scientist who is typically a scientist in charge of a main scientific organization, typically a national academy of science. This approach has a variety of problems and, what is the most important, practically does not add up anything new to making public statements on behalf of that same scientific organization. For the smartest and wisest ones this means they can get nothing new on such a post, provided they manage to get in charge of that scientific organization first. There are state awards for moderate (usually of local significance or scale) and smaller scientific results, with possible moderate benefits (unless this is something special or is something sensible additionally available or is neatly fitting), or even titles (usually general ones with many people already having it) in some countries but they obviously don't correspond to just few people in the whole world throughout all the history with achievements on the top of intellectual capabilities and at the same time of doubtlessly large importance and so in general having exceptional significance which is why such relatively standard and not appropriate for this case approach is not reflected in the table below.

Date: 20.11.2024, 25.12.2024, 22.02.2025

The table (without any guaranteed accuracy) with special privileges and rights for the smartest and wisest ones by counries:

Country	Description
China	As single laureates they are almost guaranteed to get Chinese citizenship in several months provided they have good enough knowledge of Chinese. Also the right to get an apartment in China or money for it. [1] , [2]
France	Since 07.12.2023 as single laureates of the mentioned awards they are promised to have a chance to enter a Presidential Council for Science of 12 selected scientists with obligation to gather up at least one time per quarter and likely the right to directly participate in decision-making to some extent. Likely there is also need to obtain corresponding citizenship somehow first. [1] , [2] .
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Andorra
Angola
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Brunei
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
Colombia
Comoros
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czechia
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East Timor
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Fiji
Finland
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Grenada
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Ivory Coast
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Kosovo
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Micronesia
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
North Korea
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestine
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Republic of the Congo
Romania
Russia
Rwanda
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South Korea
South Sudan
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Togo
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City
Venezuela
Vietnam
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Estonia	-